Skip to main content

Medicaid's Five-Year Look-Back Period and Penalties for Gifting

Many of my elder law clients in northern Michigan have questions about the Medicaid look-back period and penalties for gifting.  The first thing to know is that Medicaid planning to protect assets can be done at any time, even during the look-back period, or after a client is in a nursing home.  With that initial piece of information in hand, we can proceed to an explanation of the Medicaid system for penalizing gifts.

The Michigan Department of Health and Human Services processes applications for Medicaid benefits.  DHHS policy directs an eligibility specialist to investigate all gifts, or transfers for less than fair market value, that an applicant or his spouse made within five years of the applicant being in a nursing home and otherwise being eligible for Medicaid.  Let's unpack that a little bit. 

First, there are two thresholds to cross before a gift penalty begins to run.  The applicant must be in long-term care and eligible for Medicaid based on his current assets.  What that means is that the look-back period doesn't even begin until an applicant is receiving care and is below Medicaid's asset limits.

Second, DHHS can consider all outright gifts made in the look-back period, and any transfers for less than fair market value.  For example, let's say you sell a $10,000 car to a grandchild in need, but you give them a deal and sell it for $8,000.  That is a $2,000 gift for Medicaid purposes.  DHHS can add up every gift, no matter how small, when using its penalty formula.  Applicants have been penalized for small tithes to churches, for small Christmas gifts, for buying food for a destitute child, etc.  It all depends on how aggressive the DHHS eligibility specialist processing the application is.

Third, the gifts are called divestments for the Medicaid program.  DHHS has a formula for punishing gifts made in the five-year look-back period.  DHHS adds every gift made in the look-back period to get a total divestment amount.  By adding all the gifts together, even $20 gifts can add to your penalty.  Once the total divestment amount is calculated, DHHS divides that number by the average cost of a nursing home in Michigan; $8,261 for 2018.  This results in a number of years, months or days that Medicaid will not pay for long-term care expenses.  For an easy example, let's say you had a total divestment amount of $82,610, the formula would result in the applicant being ineligible for Medicaid long-term care coverage for ten months.

A divestment can only be corrected by returning 100% of the gift, or by paying fair market value.  Once a penalty period begins to run, the penalty days are lost, even if the gift is later returned.

This is a complicated area of law, with the potential for devasting consequences.  If you have any questions about Medicaid divestments and penalties, please feel free to schedule a free consultation by calling (231) 947-6800.

John J. Rizzo III
Swogger, Bruce & Millar Law Firm, P.C.
10691 East Carter Road, Suite 103
Traverse City, MI 49684
(231) 947-6800
www.swoggerandbruce.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Medicaid Nursing Home Asset Protection

Rizzo Elder Law, PLC I have been an Elder Law attorney in Traverse City, Michigan for over 15 years.  During that time I have focused on getting nursing home residents Medicaid long-term care benefits. It has become harder and harder to receive Medicaid long-term care benefits.  The Michigan Department of Health and Human Services looks more critically at spend-downs and asset conversion.  Now more than ever it is important to have an experienced attorney with the best planning tools. In most cases I can protect more assets than an average Medicaid asset protection plan.  You do not have to spend-down on items you do not need, or spend half your assets to qualify for Medicaid long-term care benefits. I am accepting new clients in Northern Michigan.  I am based out of Traverse City; a beautiful city I made my home almost 20 years ago.

Jeff Bartel's Commitment to Philanthropy

This is the first part of a series looking at business leaders and their charitable work. I want to explore how different leaders prioritize corporate social responsibility and business ethics. Accordingly, I am putting the spotlight on Jeff Bartel, a Miami entrepreneur and Managing Director of the Hamptons Group, who was appointed to the newly created position of Corporate Responsibility Officer for Florida Power and Light back in 2010 before these roles became standard in the corporate ecosystem. I will cover some of the highlights from Jeff’s charitable work from 2006 to 2012 and plan to feature his charitable work from 2013 to 2022 in a future article. Reducing Carbon Dioxide Emissions In 2006, Jeff worked with Sarasota County officials to help them make a strong environmental commitment so Florida Power and Light ( FPL) could build its first solar array . Sarasota County voted to allow one of its underused park locations to erect the solar array and was projected to reduce carbon

Maine's Governor Defies Voters Approval of Medicaid Expansion

Although Maine residents passed a ballot measure to expand Medicaid with 59 percent approval, Gov. Paul LePage is resisting.  Gov. LePage has vetoed Medicaid expansion legislation five times.  LePage has stated that opening up the program to more low-income residents would hurt the state's finances.  LePage believes that Maine should not raise taxes to pay for the expansion. Traditional Medicaid imposes coverage requirements based on income, household size, disability, and other factors.  Expanded Medicaid allows you to qualify based on your income alone.  If your household income is below 133% of the federal poverty level, you qualify.  Medicaid expansion would provide health insurance coverage to at least 70,000 low-income residents. Medicaid expansion is having a disproportionately positive impact in rural communities.  Rural uninsured rates have dropped dramatically compared to metropolitan areas.  Expansion has also reduced disparities in coverage by race, age, and incom