Skip to main content

At Veterans Hospital in Oregon, a Push for Better Ratings Puts Patients at Risk, Doctors Say


ROSEBURG, Ore. — An 81-year-old veteran hobbled into the emergency room at the rural Veterans Affairs hospital here in December, malnourished and dehydrated, his skin flecked with ulcers and his ribs broken from a fall at home.

A doctor examining the veteran — a 20-year Air Force mechanic named Walter Savage who had been living alone — decided he was in no shape to care for himself and should be admitted to the hospital. A second doctor running the inpatient ward agreed.

But the hospital administration said no.

Though there were plenty of empty beds, records show that a nurse in charge of enforcing administration restrictions said Mr. Savage was not sick enough to qualify for admission to the hospital. He waited nine hours in the emergency room until, finally, he was sent home.

“The doctors were mad; the nurses were mad,” said Mr. Savage’s son-in-law, Mark Ridimann. “And my dad, he was mad, too. He kept saying, ‘I’ve laid my life on the line, two years in Vietnam, and this is what I get?’”

The denial appeared to be part of an attempt by members of the Roseburg Veterans Administration Medical Center to limit the number of patients it admitted to the hospital in an effort to lift its quality-of-care ratings.

Fewer patients meant fewer chances of bad outcomes and better scores for a ranking system that grades all veterans hospitals on a scale of one to five stars. In 2016, administrators began cherry-picking cases against the advice of doctors — turning away complicated patients and admitting only the lowest-risk ones in order to improve metrics, according to multiple interviews with doctors and nurses at the hospital and a review of documents.

Follow the link below for the full story.

At Veterans Hospital in Oregon a Push for Better Ratings Puts Patients At Risk, Doctors Say

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Jeff Bartel's Commitment to Philanthropy

This is the first part of a series looking at business leaders and their charitable work. I want to explore how different leaders prioritize corporate social responsibility and business ethics. Accordingly, I am putting the spotlight on Jeff Bartel, a Miami entrepreneur and Managing Director of the Hamptons Group, who was appointed to the newly created position of Corporate Responsibility Officer for Florida Power and Light back in 2010 before these roles became standard in the corporate ecosystem. I will cover some of the highlights from Jeff’s charitable work from 2006 to 2012 and plan to feature his charitable work from 2013 to 2022 in a future article. Reducing Carbon Dioxide Emissions In 2006, Jeff worked with Sarasota County officials to help them make a strong environmental commitment so Florida Power and Light ( FPL) could build its first solar array . Sarasota County voted to allow one of its underused park locations to erect the solar array and was projected to reduce carbon...
Post a Comment
Read more

Medicaid's Five-Year Look-Back Period and Penalties for Gifting

Many of my elder law clients in northern Michigan have questions about the Medicaid look-back period and penalties for gifting.  The first thing to know is that Medicaid planning to protect assets can be done at any time, even during the look-back period, or after a client is in a nursing home.  With that initial piece of information in hand, we can proceed to an explanation of the Medicaid system for penalizing gifts. The Michigan Department of Health and Human Services processes applications for Medicaid benefits.  DHHS policy directs an eligibility specialist to investigate all gifts, or transfers for less than fair market value, that an applicant or his spouse made within five years of the applicant being in a nursing home and otherwise being eligible for Medicaid.  Let's unpack that a little bit.  First, there are two thresholds to cross before a gift penalty begins to run.  The applicant must be in long-term care and eligible for Medicaid based on...
Post a Comment
Read more

If You Haven’t Been Regularly Reviewing Your Estate Plan, Start When You Hit 60

How frequently you should review your estate plan depends on how old you are and whether there has been a significant change in your circumstances. If you are over age 60 and you haven't updated your estate plan in many decades, it's almost certain that you need to update your documents. After that, you should review your plan every five years or so. But if you are younger, you don't need to do so nearly as often. Age Here are a few age ranges and what they mean in terms of estate planning: 18-30    Everyone needs a durable power of attorney, health care proxy and HIPAA release so that they have people they choose to step in and make decisions for them in the event of incapacity. 30-40    Once you begin accumulating assets, get married, and have children, it's important to create an estate plan to care for your loved ones in the event of your death. It also can't hurt to update your durable power of attorney, health care proxy and HIPAA release, since the peopl...
Post a Comment
Read more