Skip to main content

At Veterans Hospital in Oregon, a Push for Better Ratings Puts Patients at Risk, Doctors Say


ROSEBURG, Ore. — An 81-year-old veteran hobbled into the emergency room at the rural Veterans Affairs hospital here in December, malnourished and dehydrated, his skin flecked with ulcers and his ribs broken from a fall at home.

A doctor examining the veteran — a 20-year Air Force mechanic named Walter Savage who had been living alone — decided he was in no shape to care for himself and should be admitted to the hospital. A second doctor running the inpatient ward agreed.

But the hospital administration said no.

Though there were plenty of empty beds, records show that a nurse in charge of enforcing administration restrictions said Mr. Savage was not sick enough to qualify for admission to the hospital. He waited nine hours in the emergency room until, finally, he was sent home.

“The doctors were mad; the nurses were mad,” said Mr. Savage’s son-in-law, Mark Ridimann. “And my dad, he was mad, too. He kept saying, ‘I’ve laid my life on the line, two years in Vietnam, and this is what I get?’”

The denial appeared to be part of an attempt by members of the Roseburg Veterans Administration Medical Center to limit the number of patients it admitted to the hospital in an effort to lift its quality-of-care ratings.

Fewer patients meant fewer chances of bad outcomes and better scores for a ranking system that grades all veterans hospitals on a scale of one to five stars. In 2016, administrators began cherry-picking cases against the advice of doctors — turning away complicated patients and admitting only the lowest-risk ones in order to improve metrics, according to multiple interviews with doctors and nurses at the hospital and a review of documents.

Follow the link below for the full story.

At Veterans Hospital in Oregon a Push for Better Ratings Puts Patients At Risk, Doctors Say

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Children’s Insurance, Other Health Programs Funded — For Now — In Bill

The bill passed by Congress late Thursday to keep most of the federal government funded for another month also provided a temporary reprieve to a number of health programs in danger of running out of money, most notably the Children’s Health Insurance Program, or CHIP. Funding for CHIP technically expired Oct. 1. States have been operating their programs with leftover funds provided by the Department of Health and Human Services since then. But  nearly half of the states were projected to run out of money entirely by the end of January, putting health coverage for nearly 2 million children at risk by that point. The funding provided by Congress for CHIP — $2.85 billion — is for six months, but it is back-dated to Oct. 1, so it will run out at the end of March 2018. The program covers 9 million children across the country. Follow the link below for the full story. Childrens Insurance Other Health Programs Funded For Now In Bill
Post a Comment
Read more

Medicaid's Five-Year Look-Back Period and Penalties for Gifting

Many of my elder law clients in northern Michigan have questions about the Medicaid look-back period and penalties for gifting.  The first thing to know is that Medicaid planning to protect assets can be done at any time, even during the look-back period, or after a client is in a nursing home.  With that initial piece of information in hand, we can proceed to an explanation of the Medicaid system for penalizing gifts. The Michigan Department of Health and Human Services processes applications for Medicaid benefits.  DHHS policy directs an eligibility specialist to investigate all gifts, or transfers for less than fair market value, that an applicant or his spouse made within five years of the applicant being in a nursing home and otherwise being eligible for Medicaid.  Let's unpack that a little bit.  First, there are two thresholds to cross before a gift penalty begins to run.  The applicant must be in long-term care and eligible for Medicaid based on...
Post a Comment
Read more

Maine's Governor Defies Voters Approval of Medicaid Expansion

Although Maine residents passed a ballot measure to expand Medicaid with 59 percent approval, Gov. Paul LePage is resisting.  Gov. LePage has vetoed Medicaid expansion legislation five times.  LePage has stated that opening up the program to more low-income residents would hurt the state's finances.  LePage believes that Maine should not raise taxes to pay for the expansion. Traditional Medicaid imposes coverage requirements based on income, household size, disability, and other factors.  Expanded Medicaid allows you to qualify based on your income alone.  If your household income is below 133% of the federal poverty level, you qualify.  Medicaid expansion would provide health insurance coverage to at least 70,000 low-income residents. Medicaid expansion is having a disproportionately positive impact in rural communities.  Rural uninsured rates have dropped dramatically compared to metropolitan areas.  Expansion has also reduced disparities ...
Post a Comment
Read more